<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Robo-Personalities For Your Inbox?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.y2ism.net/robo-personalities-for-your-inbox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.y2ism.net/robo-personalities-for-your-inbox/</link>
	<description>All That Is, but Nothing In Particular</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 10:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: GrievyNeiff</title>
		<link>http://blog.y2ism.net/robo-personalities-for-your-inbox/#comment-1569</link>
		<dc:creator>GrievyNeiff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.y2ism.net/robo-personalities-for-your-inbox/#comment-1569</guid>
		<description>I like to show you my   tubular  pilot  I have a nice fresh joke for you people)   What goes "moof"? A cow with buck teeth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like to show you my   tubular  pilot  I have a nice fresh joke for you people)   What goes &#8220;moof&#8221;? A cow with buck teeth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayo</title>
		<link>http://blog.y2ism.net/robo-personalities-for-your-inbox/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.y2ism.net/robo-personalities-for-your-inbox/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>So if we did have robot suits... I mean mirrors... is that really desirable?  How are we most true to ourselves, by paring down or building up?  Which way leaves us more whole?  Or are both ways right?  It seems the world is attempting the the "building up" approach.

I have this theory that our lives are just like the end of the book 100 Years of Solitude.  That it is already all written, but we will come up with ways to create a new system to do what we could've done had we pared down, and once we've accomplished it we'll learn that it was that way all along.  

In other words... I agree with you Y2 that roboty things may raise our consciousness and reveal our true selves, but in the end it's a much more lengthy process than had we just been true to begin with.

That being said, I'm not even sure I got what you wrote about.  Did I get the gist of it?  

PS - Your writing is waaay more complex than the column Jaron's World in Discover Magazine.  He's the reason I even have a clue what an avatar is.  You should blog on Discovermagazine.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if we did have robot suits&#8230; I mean mirrors&#8230; is that really desirable?  How are we most true to ourselves, by paring down or building up?  Which way leaves us more whole?  Or are both ways right?  It seems the world is attempting the the &#8220;building up&#8221; approach.</p>
<p>I have this theory that our lives are just like the end of the book 100 Years of Solitude.  That it is already all written, but we will come up with ways to create a new system to do what we could&#8217;ve done had we pared down, and once we&#8217;ve accomplished it we&#8217;ll learn that it was that way all along.  </p>
<p>In other words&#8230; I agree with you Y2 that roboty things may raise our consciousness and reveal our true selves, but in the end it&#8217;s a much more lengthy process than had we just been true to begin with.</p>
<p>That being said, I&#8217;m not even sure I got what you wrote about.  Did I get the gist of it?  </p>
<p>PS - Your writing is waaay more complex than the column Jaron&#8217;s World in Discover Magazine.  He&#8217;s the reason I even have a clue what an avatar is.  You should blog on Discovermagazine.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.190 seconds -->

